On June 2, a few days before the California primary, Hillary Clinton gave up trying to compete with Bernie Sanders on domestic policy. Instead, she zeroed in on the soft target of Donald Trump’s most “bizarre rants” in order to present herself as experienced and reasonable. Evidently taking her Democratic Party nomination for granted, she is positioning herself as the perfect candidate for hawkish Republicans.
Choosing to speak in San Diego, home base of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, on a platform draped with 19 American flags and preceded by half an hour of military marching music, Hillary Clinton was certain of finding a friendly audience for her celebration of American “strength”, “values” and “exceptionalism”. Cheered on by a military audience, Hillary was already assuming the role to which she most ardently aspires: that of Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.
Whenever Hillary speaks, one must look for the lies.The biggest lies in this speech were lies of omission. No mention of her support for the invasion of Iraq, no mention of the disaster she wrought in Libya, no mention of her contribution to pursuing endless death and destruction in the Middle East.
But she also lied in claiming partial credit for the Iran nuclear deal, which she had tended to block, and most profoundly in presenting herself as a champion of diplomacy. As Secretary of State, she blocked diplomacy that would have prevented or ended conflict, most notoriously concerning Libya, where even senior U.S. military officers were told to cut off their contacts with Gaddafi agents seeking a peaceful compromise.
The Washington Post reported prior to the speech that her campaign “hopes there are many more national-security-minded Republicans and independents who would vote for her, even grudgingly, rather than see Trump win the White House.”
The Washington Post noted that the state of California’s “defense industry and military bases lend a backdrop for her speech.” Indeed! Hillary Clinton is quite simply catering to the military-industrial complex, as she has been doing throughout her career. She is catering to the arms industry, which needs to keep the American people scared of various “threats” in order to continue draining the nation’s wealth into their profitable enterprises. She needs the support of military men and women who believe in all those threats invented by intellectuals in think tanks and editorial offices.
This is the core of the “national-security-minded” electorate that Hillary is targeting. She warned that Trump would jeopardize the wonderful bipartisan foreign policy that has been keeping us great and safe for decades.
In reality, such “national-security-minded” leaders as Dick Cheney and Clinton herself have led the United States into wars that create chaos, inspire enemies and endanger everybody’s national security. Despite the geographically safe position of the United States, it is that bipartisan War Party that has created genuine threats to U.S. national security by prodding the hornets’ nest of religious fanaticism in the Middle East and provoking nuclear-armed Russia by aggressive military exercises right up to its borders.
The basis of Hillary Clinton’s world view is that notorious “American exceptionalism” which Obama has also celebrated. If we don’t rule the world, she suggested, “others will rush in to fill the vacuum”. She clearly cannot conceive of dealing respectfully with other nations. The United States, she proclaimed, is “exceptional – the last best hope on earth.”
Not all people on earth feel that way. So they must be brought to heel. In practice, this “exceptionalism” means acting above the law. It means a unipolar world policed by U.S. armed forces. In practice, Hillary’s devotion to “our allies” means fighting wars in the Middle East for the benefit of Israel and of Saudi Arabia, whose arms purchases are indispensable for our military industrial complex. It means bombing countries and overthrowing foreign governments, from Honduras to Syria and beyond, in order to help them conform to “our values”.
Trump is groping clumsily, at times idiotically, toward a major shift in US foreign policy. He is ill-prepared for the task.If ever elected, he would have to fire the neocons and take on a whole new team of experts to educate and guide him. That would be something of a miracle.
But some of Hillary’s reproaches aimed at Trump’s “reckless, risky” foreign policy statements are not as self-evident as she assumes. For example, his statement that he would sit down to negotiate with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Is that really such a crazy idea?
North Korea is a small country, whose leaders call themselves “communist” but who are essentially a dynasty that emerged from the resistance against Japanese invaders in World War II. Their quarrel with South Korea stemmed from the domination of Japanese collaborators in that part of the country. That is practically ancient history, and today North Korea feels threatened – and is indeed threatened – by the everlasting U.S. military presence on its borders. A small isolated country like North Korea is not a real “threat” to the world. Even with nuclear weapons. Its much-vaunted nuclear weapons are clearly meant both to defend itself from attack and as a bargaining chip.
So would it be so terrible to sit down and find out what the bargain might be? Basically, North Korean leaders would like to make a deal to lessen the U.S. threat and bring their country out of isolation. Why not discuss this, since it could lead to the end of the “North Korean threat” which is artificial anyway?
Hillary’s reaction is typical. She boasts that her solution is to build up an expensive missile defense shield in Japan and increase everybody’s military buildup in the region. As usual, she goes for the military solution, ridiculing the notion of diplomacy.
Hillary Clinton’s speech will certainly sound convincing to the “national security minded” because it is so familiar. The same as George W. Bush but delivered with much greater polish. America is good, America is great, we must remain strong to save the world. This is the road to disaster.
Luke Rudkowski will be covering the Bilderberg protest from 6/7/16 – 6/9/16.
So we thought what better way to hype up Luke’s trip, then to take a brief look back at Bilderberg’s history.
The mysterious Bilderberg organization, a secret elite meeting of banking, media, corporations, finance and government, was once shrouded in secrecy and denied by the mainstream media who called it a “conspiracy theory”.
Luke previously confronted Stephen Colbert asking him if he knew about the Bilderberg Group.
Colbert then unscheduled talked about the Bilderberg Group and asked them to not kill free-lance journalists.
The Bilderberg Group’s attendees meet every year for two days to discuss the coming year’s political policies. Former Secretary General of NATO Willy Claes even admitted this in 2010.
“Absolutely. Yes, Bilderberg conference is indeed established, say to strengthen the alliance between the two sides of the Atlantic and very strong to take with regard to the Communist danger that threatened from the Soviet Union and the Soviet bloc, yes,” said Claes.
Then in 2013, Italian Supreme Court President Ferdinando Imposimato called Bilderberg
a terrorist organization responsible for Operation Gladio to destabilize public order and stabilize political power. He went on to implicate the Bilderberg Group in the massacres of Italian activists during the seventies and eighties.
These statements were made during the launch of his book “La repubblica delle stragi impunite,” which means “The Republic Where Massacres Go Unpunished.”
“The Bilderberg Group is behind the so-called ‘strategy of tension,’ and therefore the massacres,” says Ferdinando Imposimato, Honorary President of the Supreme Court as he makes references to a document written more than 40 years ago – and which was almost lost- during the promotion of his new book, “La repubblica delle stragi impunite,” which translates to “The republic where massacres go unpunished.”
“We found the truth about the massacres. There has been complicity between the state – or factions of the state – and the Mafia, as well as (black ops) terrorism and freemasonry. These elements came together during Operation Gladio, and consist of multiple international organizations, controlled by the CIA. This is a proven fact. The purpose of their actions was to destabilize public order and stabilize the political power,” said Imposimato.
Yet still outlets like the BBC want to mock the fact that powerful people meet in secret by making claims that elites are all lizards. The media always uses some ridiculous joke to discredit the very real fact that unelected “elite” are meeting in secret to discuss political affairs – in violation of U.S. law for any Congressman in attendance. These elite feel entitled to meet in secret without any cameras or reporters while they make policy to try and shape government policies.
Thanks to outlets like We Are Change, the Bilderberg Group has the eyes of the on it. Oh, and Edmond de Rothschild and Baron Rothschild just remember you are WANTED only one country over in France for FRAUD.
It seems the UK government has officially turned into Big Brother.
Recently, the UK government passed a shocking piece of legislation – a “hate speech” law that prohibits “hate speech” on social media and carries a sentencing of “re-education camps” for offenders. The re-education camps were proposed in the US and circulated by an online manual,
but now the UK has actually activated them.
So who defines what is and isn’t hate speech? Is someone’s personal opinion about a politician hate speech or is it free speech?
Is it someone’s “opinion” that Downing Street bureucrats forged academic papers about WMDs to fraudulently invade and go to war with Iraq – or is it hate speech?
On top of that, Tony Blair and Bush talked about going to war with Iraq an entire year prior to the invasion – or is that hate speech?
According to the new legislation, conspiracy theories are a form of hate speech. So holding our government accountable for its asinine behavior is now hate speech punishable by law in the UK. What happened to the duty to keep tyranny in check? To make sure fascist laws like this don’t pass?
In another display of outright insanity the UK government in 2013 wanted to completely ban pornography under the pretense that it would better protect children. Hold on this is the same UK government that is embroiled in accusations of pedophilia in Parliament right? Interestingly enough, David Cameron’s aide Patrick Rock who had this brilliant idea to protect children was arrested for indecent images of children and child pornography. This bill to ban pornography was also nicely wrapped with a secret snuck in passage to “ban conspiracy theories.” Most bills usually have some legislation hidden in the piles of pages that most lawmakers in the US and UK never bother to read. This is seen by US Congressman Stephen Cohen’s reaction to Jesse Ventura’s Question about the “residential centers” and the FEMA bill text in HR645.
Cohen first continuously denies knowing anything about the bill making jokes about aliens, then he says, “Oh yes I remember now those camps are for emergency situations like Katrina I think that’s what it is.”
Jessie goes on to say speaking to the viewer:
“You think that’s what it is? You can see how things work in Washington, Congressmen sponsor bills because they are told to or they get money for their district. If we speak out maybe next time we can talk to our leaders before they sign on the dotted line.”
This is just one of several available examples of Congressmen not reading a bill and sponsoring or co-sponsoring a bill. Even recently, Congressman x admitted he never reads bills he votes on. That is exactly why we need to get rid of lobbying and why it should be viewed as legal bribery.
Back in 2014, Cameron made a little speech about how conspiracy theories fuel extremist violence. I wonder how much research David Cameron did on these so called “conspiracy theories?”
Has Mr. Cameron, who said “We Need a New World Order,” disavowed Agenda 21? Agenda 21 is an overthrow of an elected government similar to how Prescott Bush tried to overthrow FDR as warned by General Smedley Butler? Prescott Bush, the Bush dynasty father, also funded Hitler. His bank was tied to funding the Nazis. So maybe these are the psychopaths who should be in the dissident camps?
NATO is another documented agency running a Falseflag called Operation Gladio killing innocent civilians over the years. You would be insulting our intelligence if you said otherwise and wanted us to forget about such horrific historical actions because there may be as you call them “Conspiracy Theories,” but there are also very well document-able events that are bonifiable Facts.
So if you want the trust of the people I suggest you start answering and not dodging the hard questions like admitting you are a tax evading criminal. If its criminal for citizens to
evade taxes its criminal for you to horde money in an offshore account. Oh and no Mr. Cameron, this isn’t hate speech its advice, any government that opts to put its citizens in any form of a camp is a hair away from being the next Nazi SS regime and a dictatorship.
We already had a dictator named Hitler we don’t need a second Hitler. Maybe your Mama never taught you the saying but i think this ought to be taught in the UK, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”
Words are not missiles Mr. Cameron, words do not cause violent extremism, failed government foreign policy in the middle east is what causes violent extremism.
David Cameron’s quoted as saying:
“We must defeat this Ideology in all its forms, as evidence emerges of backgrounds of those convicted of terrorist offenses, its clear that many of them were influenced by preachers who claim not to encourage violence but who’s world view can be used as a justification for it.
We know this world view, the peddling of lies that 911 was somehow a Jewish plot or that the 7/7 London attacks were staged.
The idea that Muslims are prosecuted all over the world as a deliberate act of western policy. We must be clear to defeat the ideology of extremism we need to deal with all forms of extremism not just violent extremism. For governments there are some obvious ways to do this, we must ban preachers of hate from coming to our countries, we must proscribe organizations that incite terrorism at home and abroad.
We must work together to take down illegal online material like the recent video’s of Isil murdering hostages, and we must stop the so called non-violent extremist from inciting hatred and intolerance in our schools, university’s and yes even our prisons.
Of course some would argue that this is not compatible with free speech and intellectual inquiry.”
Well now David Cameron got his wish, as conspiracy theorists who deny the Holocaust, can be imprisoned. I don’t deny the Holocaust personally (I think that it happened but the death count was exaggerated), but I also feel its absolute hypocrisy that people who deny the Holocaust are being sent to a “Dissident re-training camp” which is a nice way of saying concentration camp when that’s where Jewish people were sent to die. Also who wrote such an insane piece of legislation? Why does it seem to be focused on Judaism? Do the same rules apply for the Zionist, who’s world view is everyone but them are inferior and that even fellow Jewish people are expendable? Calling out blatant Zionism isn’t anti-Semitism, if anything the Zionists are
the anti-semitics.
Why would you say that? Very strange choice of words suspicious indeed, I don’t think there is a Jewish cabal or western plan to destroy Islam more so an elite mafia of Zionist gangsters who
want to control the world.
I hope these Internment Camps have bottom and top bunks! Will there be forced vaccination centers for all the disobeying plebians?
The new bill making speech a hate crime is below. Watch what you say – the Internet police might show up at your door for that next tweet or social media post – they have already arrested dozens of people in London.
The Section about imprisoning conspiracy theorist and government dissidents is below, you can read the full text of the legislation here .
Now the EU has proposed issuing a bio-metric Government ID to Use the Internet and travel within the EU, use national health insurance, Access bank accounts, Take public transportation and even vote. This is the New World Order folks its time to fight back or bow down to the tyranny your rights are vanishing first they came for Europe then it was America and it
was too late..
(a) The following acts will be regarded as criminal offences punishable as aggravated crimes:
(i) Hate crimes as defined in Section 1(c).
(ii) Incitement to violence against a group as defined in Section 1(a).
(iii) Group libel as defined in Section 1(b).
(iv) Overt approval of a totalitarian ideology, xenophobia or anti-Semitism.
(v) Public approval or denial of the Holocaust.
(vi) Public approval or denial of any other act of genocide the existence of which has been determined by an international criminal court or tribunal.
(b)Juveniles convicted of committing crimes listed in paragraph (a) will be required to undergo a rehabilitation programme designed to instill in them a culture of tolerance.
(iv) Overt approval of a totalitarian ideology, xenophobia or anti-Semitism.
After surviving firefights and a roadside bomb in Afghanistan, U.S. Army veteran Asa Barrett tried antidepressant drugs and therapy to overcome depression and bouts of anger. Nothing worked.
But then, like many other foreigners, he journeyed to Peru’s remote Amazonian jungle to drink ayahuasca, a centuries-old, sacred indigenous brew that some Western scientists think can help to heal psychological traumas.
During a recent ayahuasca ritual, the 30-rr-old from Oklahoma lay on a mattress with about 20 other travelers on the floor of a round, wooden hut in a remote resort near a tributary of the Amazon River. About 45 minutes after drinking the dark concoction, he began to see vibrant colors. He then vomited into a plastic bucket, a common reaction to ayahuasca.
Mr. Barrett acknowledged that it didn’t appear therapeutic. But he also described seeing visions of war-torn Afghanistan emerging as a shaman chanted spiritual songs called icaros. He recalled seeing bullet holes in a wall, a dead Afghan woman and the moment when an improvised explosive device almost killed him. He saw his small military base in Afghanistan’s mountainous border region with Pakistan. He heard a loud voice.
And then came a burst of light.
“It was as if I was just letting it all go,” Mr. Barrett said later. “I just felt so at ease for the first time in a long time.”
U.S. military veteran Asa Barrett at an ayahuasca center in the Peruvian jungle in January. Some Western scientists think the centuries-old, sacred indigenous brew can help heal psychological traumas.
In the Amazon, scientists have long studied plants with a range of medicinal properties. Some work as anesthetics; others can treat infections; some are known to stop bleeding. Now scientists are starting to look at ayahuasca, a potent hallucinogen known locally as “the vine of the soul” that outsiders are increasingly flocking to sample.
Scientists say that ayahuasca—which is legal in Peru and neighboring countries—activates parts of the brain that make it possible to recall deep-rooted memories, increasing self-awareness and offering a chance to reassess past ordeals. Proponents say that it can provide users with spiritual and personal guidance. Others report that it has allowed them to overcome traumas that conventional therapy and antidepressants haven’t cured.
But some scientists—and users—warn that ayahuasca can be dangerous. It can be fatal when mixed with other drugs, such as antidepressants, and should be avoided by those who are bipolar or schizophrenic, since it has been known to trigger psychotic episodes. In 2012, a young man from California died after taking ayahuasca in Peru. And last year a Canadian tourist killed a Briton during a nighttime ritual that local authorities are still investigating.
The brew is made by boiling together a jungle vine called Banisteriopsis caapi with the leaves of a shrub that contains dimethyltryptamine, or DMT, a psychedelic that is illegal in the U.S. DMT can cause seizures and, in high doses, comas and respiratory arrests, said Mike Colston, a U.S. Navy captain who heads a Department of Defense agency in charge of studying psychological health and brain injury. The hallucinations caused by ayahuasca can be so traumatic that they can worsen medical conditions such as PTSD, Dr. Colston cautioned.
In Peru, the influx of foreigners eager to try the brew has spurred the creation of unregulated new lodges to try ayahuasca, some of which, locals say, are opportunistic and employ fake shamans with little training. The brew itself is unregulated by the Peruvian government.
Ayahuasca’s proponents say that it has powerful properties. Jeffrey Hill, a 38-year-old construction superintendent from Chicago, said that ayahuasca eased his depression. Juliet Wilkerson, 41, who lives in Texas, said that it helped to cure her debilitating migraines, which she thinks were tied to childhood abuse. Jaylene Johnston, a 53-year-old from Oklahoma, said she had visions of her deceased first husband that allowed her to overcome the trauma of his death and fully commit to her current spouse. “It transformed the relationships that I have right now,” she said.
The stories might seem surreal. But they have prompted growing interest by Western researchers, amid a wider revival of studies into the therapeutic use of psychedelics.
The California-based Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, which has funded researchers at Stanford University and the University of Pennsylvania, plans to support an ayahuasca study in Peru this year for people with post-traumatic stress disorder. Later, the group hopes to get approval from the Food and Drug Administration for an ayahuasca study in the U.S.
The California-based Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies aims to support an ayahuasca study in Peru this year for people with post-traumatic stress disorder. Later, the group hopes to get approval from the FDA for a study in the U.S.
Jessica Nielson, a University of California, San Francisco, neuroscientist who is leading the study, became interested in the potion after trying it herself following a difficult divorce and doubts about her career trajectory. In Peru, she saw how it helped three military veterans.
“Just witnessing their transformation inspired me,” she said. But she cautioned that ayahuasca research is in its infancy. “We really need to get more data on this to understand the safety, what are the limits and who is it appropriate for,” she said.
Other scientists are hoping to understand the brew’s properties. Charles Grob, a psychiatrist at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center who studied ayahuasca’s use in a Brazilian church, says that it might help to treat addiction. Jordi Riba, a pharmacologist at the Sant Pau Institute of Biomedical Research in Barcelona, says that ayahuasca may help ease depression.
Because the experience can be frightening, both men emphasized the importance of consuming the brew in a safe setting A.J. Bullock, a 30-year-old Army sergeant who served in Afghanistan, described nightmarish hallucinations of being chained down and confronted by demons after trying ayahuasca in Peru. It made him feel paranoid, he said, and he considered going home early. By his last ritual, he described a helpful, “radical shift in self-image.” Still, he hesitates to recommend the experience.
“I just don’t know if a lot of people would be able to walk away from it not having gone crazy or at least hurting them more than it helped them,” he said.
Despite the risks, foreigners are converging on Iquitos, a city of 500,000 in Peru’s northeastern Amazon, paying up to $2,500 a week to drink the elixir. Carmen Rojas, the head of the local tourism office, says that she knows of 22 certified jungle lodges that offer ayahuasca. But local tour operators speak of dozens more, including almost 100 ayahuasca centers along one 60-mile stretch of highway. They estimate that as many as 80,000 people a year come to Iquitos for ayahuasca.
One operator, Pulse Tours, says that its clients are mainly Americans and Canadians but also include people from as far away as Australia, China, Russia and Kazakhstan.
Some longtime ayahuasca proponents in Iquitos lament the recent influx of tourism dollars, which they feel has corrupted the ritual and put some foreigners at risk from fly-by-night operators in the burgeoning industry.
“People have got way too careless about all of this,” said Howard Lawler, 68, a Kentucky native who runs Spirit Quest Shamanic Sanctuary, one of the longest-running ayahuasca centers here. “It is never to be taken for any recreational purpose. It is a very serious medicine.”
‘We need a foreign policy based on building coalitions… [not] perpetual warfare in the Middle East’
“When it comes to foreign policy, we cannot forget that Secretary Clinton voted for the war in Iraq…and that she has been a proponent of regime change, as in Libya, without thinking through the consequences.” (Photo: Michael Vadon/flickr/cc)
Bernie Sanders responded to Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy speech on Thursday with a hit at her credentials, including her involvement in the Iraq War and so-called “regime change” in Libya.
“We need a foreign policy based on building coalitions and making certain that the brave American men and women in our military do not get bogged down in perpetual warfare in the Middle East,” he said in a statement. “That’s what I will fight for as president.”
Earlier Thursday, Clinton gave a speech that laid out her own foreign policy agenda and criticized presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump for his “thin skin” and “dangerously incoherent” ideas.
“Americans aren’t just electing a president in November, we’re choosing our next commander-in-chief, a person we count on to answer questions of war and peace, life and death,” Clinton said. “The person the Republicans have nominated for president cannot do the job.”
On that point, Sanders agreed.
However, he added, Clinton wasn’t much better.
“I agree with Secretary Clinton that Donald Trump’s foreign policy ideas are incredibly reckless and irresponsible,” he said in his statement. “But when it comes to foreign policy, we cannot forget that Secretary Clinton voted for the war in Iraq, the worst foreign policy blunder in modern American history, and that she has been a proponent of regime change, as in Libya, without thinking through the consequences.”
His comments fell in line with much of the progressive sector’s response to Clinton’s speech, which included criticism from journalists and policy experts such as Jeet Heer ofThe New Republic, Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, and Sam Husseini of the Institute for Public Accuracy.
As Jeffrey D. Sachs, director of The Earth Institute and a steadfast critic of Clinton’s hawkish foreign policy record, tweeted after her Thursday speech:
Donald Trump is "dangerously incoherent" says HRC. HRC is dangerously coherent, for war, war, war. The choice is obvious. Bernie.
On Friday, the Sanders campaign tweeted out a new campaign video, featuring Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), titled simply “Judgement.” Gabbard, still on active duty for the U.S. Army and a veteran of the Iraq War, stresses in the ad that her support for Sanders stems from his proven reluctance to put lives at risk in overseas misadventures. “[Sanders] has foresight,” she says, “when it comes to making these most critical decisions that affect us all about war or peace.” Watch:
As Common Dreams reported on Thursday, “Pew Research Center surveys have laid bare how Sanders and Clinton supporters differ on foreign policy issues,” with polls conducted in April and May finding that 66 percent of Clinton’s Democratic supporters believe world problems would be “even worse” without U.S. intervention, with only 49 percent of Sanders supporters saying the same.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
I wrote an article that I called “I Love Drugs” and Google quickly took my blog down and denied me access to its contents. So I thought that it would be a great idea to re create that blog on a website and then use my remaining Google blog to advertise it. Funny thing, I’ve had this site back up and running in some form or another for over a year but I forgot to re write the article ” I Love Drugs”. Duh!
Of course I caught a lot of flack for that article, so I thought I’d better explain myself.
First off, all prescription drugs are toxic and none cure anything.
The worthless MD’s heal nothing and treat everything with toxic chemicals that kill. When did treating symptoms get confused with healing?
Do pills for high blood pressure cure the reason you have high blood pressure? No, no way. A better way is to find the reason for the high blood pressure and correct it. Do MD’s do that? Of course not. And that my friends is modern day medicine here in the corporate empire of America where your health takes a back seat to corporate profits and MD wealth.
So many of those pills have horrible side effects like insomnia, ED and lethargy. When all that is needed is a better diet and light exercise.
Recently the CDC said that prescription drugs are killing more people than cocaine and heroin combined, hum.
So I do not partake in the pharmaceutical drugs that the rest of you take by the truck load because you are too lazy to figure out what ails you and fix it. So stop thinking that some how you are better than me and can judge what I choose to do with my own body in the privacy of my own home.
When I say that “I love Drugs” it has nothing to do with Parke-Davis.
Second, that crap that everyone else is on, white (crystal-meth) and black (heroin), I can’t stand either one. Getting high is not getting paranoid (meth) or nodding out (heroin).
Getting high is laughing (marijuana) or getting numb (cocaine in moderation) or taking a trip (LSD / magic mushrooms). Getting high is being on “a roll” (ecstasy) and enjoying yourself.
Do too much meth and you hallucinate but the hallucinations are not pleasant and you can not tell that they are hallucinations. So it’s a lot like paranoid schizophrenia, which sucks. On LSD, you actually know when you are hallucinating and the hallucinations are enjoyable.
Too much cocaine will make you paranoid with violent tendencies. So I only do cocaine in moderation. When you do too much it is no longer fun as you aren’t even getting high any more. You are just spending more and more money to get less and less high.
E and LSD can not be done daily. At the most you can do them every three days but I would not recommend it. With E you have to wait for the body to produce more serotonin. With LSD, you just need the body and mind to recuperate. Taking LSD daily will lose all effect. I love drugs and still only indulge in these less than once a month when they’re available.
The best sex you will ever have is on E (ecstasy).
Weed. Got any trees? I smoke marijuana from the time that I wake up to the time that I go to bed.
I’ve been told that I have ADHD or ADD (not by any professionals, just by weirdo’s who think they know it all.) People think that I’m high strung. Weed levels me out. Personally, I don’t think that there is anything wrong with me, I think that the rest of you are just lazy. It’s not my fault that you can’t keep up with me. And even stoned I can work rings around you. You’ll get tired just watchin’ me. Or so I’ve been told.
On drugs I’m a very mellow, forgiving, passive guy. Sober I’m easily agitated, irritated and prone to violence. You wouldn’t like me sober. I don’t like you when I’m high and I don’t like you when I’m sober, but I can tolerate you when I’m high. And that is why I LOVE DRUGS. Always have and always will. Get high and get naked.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, approximately 300-400 protesters gathered outside a Trump rally in San Jose. The San Jose Police Department designated two locations for supporters and demonstrators. The Department had an operations plan in place in an effort to ensure the safety of everyone attending the event. However, officers were confronted by some protesters who became violent, aggressive and began to throw objects in their direction. A majority of the violence occurred at the conclusion of the event. While several physical assaults did occur, the police personnel on scene had the difficult task of weighing the need to immediately apprehend the suspect(s) against the possibility that police action involving the use of physical force under the circumstances would further insight the crowd and produce more violent behavior. As Trump supporters were exiting the Convention Center, officers directed the crowd away from the protesters and suggested alternate routes of egress in order to prevent violence or a large-scale confrontation. This required the forming of crowd control lines of uniformed officers to act as a physical barrier to facilitate the movement of the crowd out of the area. The San Jose Police Department subsequently made four arrests for incidents including assault with a deadly weapon and unlawful assembly. A San Jose Police sergeant suffered minor injuries after a protester struck him with a metal object. The Department is currently reviewing available footage and beginning the investigative process to identify suspects who were involved in criminal behavior, particularly physical assaults, so that warrants can be sought for their arrest. The Police Department encourages any members of the public who witnessed assaults or who are possession of video footage depicting physical assaults to contact the San Jose Police Department and cooperate with the ongoing investigations.
The police chief, Eddie Garcia, also said that the police are not an ‘occupying force’, perhaps indicating that Chief Garcia’s mind really wasn’t in the right place in thinking how to react to these attacks.
In this video Luke Rudkowski breaks down the latest developments between the U.S and Russian aggression against each other. We are seeing the escalations to what could lead to a global conflict between the two and how the situation is spiraling out of control.
The US military’s move to deploy strategic B-52 bombers and other weaponry on Russian borders for joint drill with NATO is a dangerous move that could spiral into a full-fledged war threatening the whole world, says an American analyst based in Washington.
NATO’s build-up in the Baltics is unnecessary. chicagotribune.com reports:
While showing off some new UAZ Patriot pickup trucks armed with machine guns and grenade launchers to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, a general couldn’t open the door of one of the trucks and, in his desperate desire to please the commander-in-chief, ripped off the door handle. “Well done,” Putin said, laughing.
Meanwhile, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is debating how most effectively to deter Russia from invading the Baltic States. The U.S. has already proposed quadrupling the budget of the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, to $3.4 billion in 2017. A billion dollars of that sum is to add another armored brigade combat team, 4,000 to 5,000 strong, to the 35,000 U.S. troops already present in Europe. Another $1.9 billion is earmarked for additional war-fighting equipment. Still, many U.S. analysts still believe that may not be enough for deterrence.
They should watch the door-handle video and ask themselves if they aren’t being hoodwinked.
RAND Corporation recently held a war game to see if the Baltic states were defensible against Russia and concluded that, with the current level of protection, the Russian military could get to Tallinn and Riga in as little as 60 hours. To prevent such an outcome, Rand concluded that NATO would need seven brigades, including three with heavy armor, “adequately supported by air power, land-based fires, and other enablers on the ground and ready to fight at the onset of hostilities.”
But if there was to be war with Russia, what might it look like? The Cold War scenario of vast armies fighting a large-scale conventional war dominated by tanks and aircraft directly supporting the battlefield is as outdated a concept as it is unlikely.
Both sides have considerable resources at their disposal but NATO is significantly larger than Russia in simple numbers: NATO has a total of 3.6m personnel in uniform, Russia 800,000; NATO 7,500 tanks, Russia 2,750; NATO 5,900 combat aircraft, Russia 1,571. However, these bald figures do not tell the whole story as NATO’s forces are deployed globally to a far greater extent than Russia’s, and even acknowledging that Russia could achieve a temporary military advantage in, say, the Baltic, for how long and at what price? Nevertheless, today’s armies are smaller and more reliant on technology than they were during much of the 20th century and the likelihood of a Kursk-style pitched battle between heavy armour is highly unlikely.
That said, the ever-greater reach of missiles and artillery, the accuracy and potency of modern precision-guided munitions, the extensive use of surveillance systems (from space, via drones, and through highly sophisticated electronic eavesdropping) would make a contemporary battlefield highly dangerous and highly destructive, as pictures from even relatively small-scale recent conflicts from Grozny to Aleppo show.
Consequently, while the armies and individual battles might be smaller than those in World War II, the death toll, the loss of war-making material and both sides’ ability to reduce everything in their paths to rubble would make a large-scale conflict far more wide-reaching and, in terms of recovery, longer-lasting than anything we have seen before.
In such a conflict, the very term “battlefield” would itself be highly misleading: such a war, employing ships, submarines and aircraft with truly global reach, would indeed be a world war and would pay scant attention to the difference between military and civilian targets: this would truly be a war among the peoples.
And not just an earth-bound war: outer space would be a highly contested arena as would cyberspace, with both sides seeking to disrupt all aspects of normal life as the war was taken into the realms of politics, infrastructure, information and commerce, too.
Despite Shirreff’s warnings, the nightmare scenario of nuclear war is highly unlikely as neither side ultimately would wish to unleash destruction on that scale. Likewise, chemical and biological weapons would, if employed at all, be used at a very local level, and sparingly.
That is not to say that the scale of the destruction would not be significant, however. This would be total war, waged on every imaginable front, from the internet and the stock market to outer space.
“NATO PLEADS WITH RUSSIA PLEASE DO NOT BOMB AL NUSRA FRONT – AL QAEDA IN SYRIA”
Published on Jun 5, 2016
In this video Luke Rudkowski breaks down the latest developments between the U.S and Russian aggression against each other. We are seeing the escalations to what could lead to a global conflict between the two and how the situation is spiralingout of control. For more video reports invest in us http://ift.tt/1TwrlaK here
Image (Source) Mike Mozart/Flickr and Mariusz Kluzniak/Flickr
Walmart has chipped $3.5 billion off its income tax liabilities over the past six years by stashing $76 billion in profits in offshore tax havens using a complex network of well-disguise subsidiary corporations, according to new research from one of the unions that backs long-running efforts to organize workers at the American retail giant.
The researchers combed financial disclosure documents from the U.S. and multiple other countries to uncover 78 separate Walmart subsidiaries with names like “Azure Holdings” that do not suggest that they are connected to the Arkansas-based chain of stores. Walmart “has never listed any of them” on the subsidiaries section of a required annual corporate filing with American regulators, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) report says. The company has no physical locations in those countries, but routes revenue from its thousands of international stores through the companies, about half of which are registered in Luxembourg, the Virgin Islands, and the Netherlands.
Walmart is a major overseas tax dodger, according to this report from Americans for Tax Fairness, a social economic think tank and advocacy group. The world’s largest retailer has stashed $64 billion worth of assets in Luxembourg, Europe’s smallest and most notorious tax haven.These assets—including cash and the ownership of real estate holdings around the world—are worth more than Luxembourg’s entire gross domestic product.?
In Luxembourg, the alleged tax-reduction strategy relies on a financial shell game. The company has shifted $45 billion in assets into its 22 subsidiaries there in the past four years, but reported only a fraction of that amount in profits. It paid a 1 percent tax rate in Luxembourg on $1.3 billion in profits from 2011 to 2013, according to the report. Like most other high-profile corporate tax avoiders, Walmart has achieved its massive tax savings through careful use of legal tax strategies. International tax rules involving loans between two different subsidiaries of the same company mean that Walmart can take out debt from itself, deduct the debt in one country, and pay low or non-existent tax rates on interest payments associated with the loan in a second country.
A company spokesman told Bloomberg that the report is inaccurate and misleading, and said the company complies fully with all the tax laws and corporate disclosure rules of every country in which it does business.
Legal though it may be, the network of holding companies and intermediaries is critical to the company. The $76 billion held in Luxembourg and the Netherlands alone is equal to nearly 40 percent of the company’s total assets worldwide, and 90 percent of the assets claimed by its international division. Researchers note that the total value of off-shored Walmart profits may be even higher, as the other tax haven countries’ public records laws do not make similar financial detail available for those operations.
Shifting corporate profits across borders is common among multinational companies in all industries, but most of the recent furor around the practice is focused on the tech sector. Brands like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have had their arrangements in Ireland and other European tax havens called into question by American and European Union officials. In an industry where intellectual property (IP) rights are often the key to profitability, it’s relatively easy to understand how the game works. Regardless of which country served as the cradle of innovation for the iPhone, Apple can shift the IP rights to a subsidiary in a lower-tax country. Apple pays U.S. taxes on the royalties the subsidiary pays for the rights, but not on the much larger profits from selling iPhones, which remain abroad in the subsidiary. Those arrangements have come under legal scrutiny in the the past year.
Since 2011, Walmart has transferred more than $45 billion in assets to a network of 22 shell companies in Luxembourg.
Achieving the same kind of tax benefits is messier in the retail industry. Walmart is in the business of physical things, not ideas. That’s why it has to use a system of intra-Walmart loans and tax deductions to achieve the same sort of tax sheltering outcome that the techies arrive at through royalties payments. But those loans are also in Europe’s gunsights. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has called for changes that would make that loan-and-deduct strategy unfeasible, according to Bloomberg.
All told, corporate profit offshoring costs the U.S. an estimated $50 billion per year in lost revenue. American companies now hold more than $2 trillion in profits offshore.
Media Blackout: an Elephant in the Room The Incredible Election Fraud of Hillary Clinton!
Once again the Mainstream media seems to be completely silent, no surprise really, a recurring theme this election. That theme? Election fraud, and it just always seems to be in favor of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, against Senator Bernie Sanders. Whether its voter suppression, changing voting registration information or poll rigging machines. This election primary at every twist and turn has had it all and we’re not even to the general election yet. I’ve been keeping tabs writing it all down and iv documented all the fraud by state.
Its become abundantly clear the establishment is cheating to get their candidate Hillary Clinton elected so why are all these facts ignored about Hillary’s campaign blatantly rigging to win states? As a Counter Punch article suggest its Highly Suspicious Hillary does good in states where machines can be hacked due to flunking security test..
However that’s not the only worry this election another worry is a whopping more than 30 states offered voters online voting. Supposedly at convenience but convenience for whom? The ones rigging it?
Any security professional will tell you online voting is not secure and can also be heavily tampered with finding various vulnerabilities in outdated software.
Which Wired wrote an article about how insecure online voting really is during the Utah Caucus.
The Washington Post also followed up and wrote an article where several experts warn online voting is 100% insecure.
So why then does the media or anyone for that matter refuse to acknowledge most of Hillary’s primaries and caucuses she has won against Sanders have all had voting anomaly’s?
Numbers that don’t match up, time and time again in the exit polls as investigator Richard Charin has found the poll’s don’t match up some by a whopping 10% or more.
Its a mockery of democracy bluntly in our faces by someone supposedly under investigation by the FBI..
So i wanted to be the thorn in Hillary’s side that shows what the mainstream media won’t a display of all the election fraud and the recent display in Kentucky.
To Finally put the final nail in the coffin and prove the taboo that the bought out media refuses to even utter because they are too busy taking donations from the Clinton “charity” Foundation. Emphasis on the word charity because its anything but a charity organization which even Judge Jeanine Pirro has gone on the record saying “its a violation of 501(c)(3) and an illegal operation Fraud.”
The election fraud has been going on the entire race and ignored by DNC chair Hillary long time friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Even two panelist at MSNBC have now admitted its rigged for Hillary.Schultz who has favored Hillary from the start and has absolutely failed to do her job, making sure this years election was fair and just and she should resign from her post immediately..
Despite what the media wants you to think, Election fraud is not some mythical monster beast, el’ chupacabra UFO or vast right winged conspiracy against Hillary Clinton its very real and its very easy to rig an election.
But don’t take my word for it, listen to the testimony of a computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis, who testified under oath in court and watch a Princeton University demonstration of how easy voting systems are to hack and it doesn’t require extensive technical knowledge either. Lastly watch a video by another whistle-blower who worked for Die-bold an election machine manufacturing company.
The big behemoth, is out of hiding and Its out how easy it is to rig our public office elections.
The problem for Hillary is exactly what the programmer and whistle-blower described vote flipping was caught live on TV during the Kentucky Primary on every major mainstream news TV network for America and the World to see.. Yet they have been quiet about what was witnessed..
Seemingly 5K Sanders voters vanished from the Poll numbers and Hillary was declared the winner of the Kentucky Primary Tuesday night not only were votes scrubbed but the person doing the counting Alison Grime Kentucky’s Secretary of State is good friends with Hillary. Hillary campaigned with her years prior in 2014 to unseat Mitch McConnell in the Senate she lost but when someone so close to a presidential candidate has the duty of counting votes including a friend there is no telling.. corruption knows no limits. Since Alison was so close to Hillary she should have never been allowed to do the counting someone else alternatively should have been chosen.
Prior to the Kentucky primary we had the NV primary madness but Sanders supporters have every right to be mad as our election is being stolen from us once again and its been rough. If that’s not prevalent you may have been living under a rock for Iowa’s improbable odd coin flip to win 6 precincts which according to the daily-mail was an odds out of 64-1, Boston’s poll blocking,
Arizona’s voter suppression lines, Washington’s incident where Bernie at first wasn’t going to be on the polls due to a “mistake” by the DNC, Ohio, New York, and the list goes on and on.
(See the bottom of this article for a full alphabetical List of all 50 states with documentation of anomaly’s in polls and exit polls)
On top of all that, people with rich political interest Super Delegates are controlling the outcome. A revolution is being silenced, Its the establishment not letting go and doing anything to win and stay in power but its exactly how the democratic party was setup to keep outsiders out with the Super Delegate system in the first place. So everything is working according to plan and the sheepish American public as a congressman known only as Congressman X has recently written about
In his new book are following right along with no objection therefore we are consenting to all this mistreatment and perversion of Democracy.
“Screw the next generation’ and ‘Harry Reid’s a pompous a**’: Democratic congressman X writes Anonymous tell-all book slamming ‘nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep’ as he admits he never reads bills he votes on” ~Congressman X
This all should be very worrying,
Our Democratic process is being couped before our very eyes year after year.
Voting doesn’t matter what matters is showing your presence protesting exposing the flawed voting system the rigging and following the money.
Whats worse is ex President Theodore Roosevelt warned us and if we don’t heed the warning and stand up and voice ourselves we deserve every last bit of what we get..
“If We Condone Political theft Our Civilization itself Can Not Endure.” ~Theodore Roosevelt, 1912.
As ex President Jimmy Carter said prior to any of this in 2015 “America has turned into an oligarchy with unlimited political power.”
Well his statement is being proven and that oligarchy doesn’t want to relinquish that power it seems otherwise the election rigging this year wouldn’t be so bluntly obvious. Ill See you in Philadelphia ill leave you with another famous quote from Edmund Burke..
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” ~Edmund Burke
So lets fix it? what can we do?
well for starters sign the report election fraud form here and flood the switchboards.
The balls in your court what will we be remembered for during this historic time in history?
Will we ignore the blatant displays of voting fraud and the crimes perpetrated against we the people allowing another election to be selected instead of elected? or will we fight back against the fraud? Time will tell since all major networks have decided we don’t have a right to see the remaining exit polls which given all the fraud documented below that should be very worrying.. as majority of the election results do not match the exit polls all over the country! Mike Huckabee was right when he said “Hillary Can’t Win Without Massive Voter Fraud.”
Over a Million AZ Voters Disenfranchised; Sanders Voters Stand in Long Lines Only to be Denied the Right to Vote; Official Results Appear Flipped/Rigged: http://ift.tt/25mulKQ
O’KEEFE STRIKES AGAIN: Undercover Video Purports to Show Hillary Campaign Violating Election Law: http://ift.tt/1UK1UhG
Hillary Lawyer Ejected From Court For Practicing Law Without a License: http://ift.tt/22GvlXr
Hillary’s win in Nevada invalid! Her caucus goers were not registered when voting. This is not just a scandal…its criminal voter fraud. Email Nevada election commission immediately to freeze records.: http://ift.tt/1oUfeY6
Clinton’s Campaign Just Got Busted Impersonating Union Nurses in Nevada:
Which One is the Fake Internet Voting Site for the Utah GOP’s ‘Online Caucus’?: http://ift.tt/1UlUoyo
Soros Board Member Chairs Firm Running Online Voting for Tuesday’s Utah Caucuses: http://ift.tt/1SbiqZ7
‘Droves’ of voters cram caucuses, face delays, ballot shortages: http://ift.tt/1WHoyJT
VERMONT: (None Found)
VIRGINIA:
Roanoke County loses 600+ votes for Sanders, no explanation: http://ift.tt/22Gvg6m
Virgin Islands (June 4th)
WASHINGTON:
Washingtonians Hound Superdelegate Who Supports Clinton After Constituents Favored Sanders: http://ift.tt/1UsZQiK
Sanders beat Hillary in Washington State 72.7% to 27.1%. Washington State has 101 delegates, but only 25 have been given to Sanders!: http://ift.tt/22Gv72M
WASHINGTON DC:
Bernie Sanders May Be Off DC Ballot After Democratic Party Filing: http://ift.tt/1VU46qZ
Sanders reportedly left off D.C. primary ballot after Democratic Party error: http://ift.tt/1SnzZCX
WEST VIRGINIA (None found)
WISCONSIN:
Voter Fraud/winner called before votes were counted:
Does Someone Know Something About The Result Of The Wisconsin Primary?: http://ift.tt/1V5sh4Y
BIO:I go by AK, short for Akilluminati on twitter or Aaron Kesel. I’m a researcher, journalist and blogtalk radio host of #SmokeScreenDisclosure writing Proudly with the We Are Change team. I’ve been researching for 10+ years, which is how I garnered the name “An0nKn0wledge” on twitter I live up to my name as every article I write, i try to give the reader as much information and research as possible on any given subject and summarize it all. I expose the conspiratorial facts and sift through the dis-information lie’s propaganda and news. Because I realize not everyone has the time and dedication to research but people want to learn I bring you my investigations and opinions you form your own. I have a no fear mentality branching from my inspirations from investigative journalist like Michael Hastings and Danny Casolaro and i will die to expose the truth. Journalism isn’t a crime, The New World Order Octopus is.
If you know of any further information or you wish to be a whistle-blower, you can contact this writer at an0nkn0wledge@protonmail.ch or on Twitter @An0nKn0wledge I have many contacts throughout the media and government. My sources and I’ve had many over the years have always been kept confidential and i respect my sources privacy, safety and will help you leak your information Anonymously whistle-blowing corruption or wrong doing is your duty as a human being.
We use Bitcoin Too ! 
I wrote an article that I called “I Love Drugs” and Google quickly took my blog down and denied me access to its contents. So I thought that it would be a great idea to re create that blog on a website and then use my remaining Google blog to advertise it. Funny thing, I’ve had 
backs long-running efforts to organize workers at the American retail giant.
